BVEStation

Author Topic: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F  (Read 62953 times)

Offline Mr Railfan

  • Head Admin
  • Dispatcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 620
  • Gender: Male
  • Train Developer and Route Developer
    • View Profile
Re: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F
« Reply #180 on: January 15, 2012, 08:18:54 pm »
Just to clear things up, the SMEE Version is the one with the manual announcements, and the NTT version is the one with the automated ones, right?
that is correct

Offline nightmare403

  • Conductor
  • **
  • Posts: 164
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F
« Reply #181 on: January 15, 2012, 08:43:20 pm »
u should make a special F route with the Culver Viaduct construction it will be cool


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Offline Mr Railfan

  • Head Admin
  • Dispatcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 620
  • Gender: Male
  • Train Developer and Route Developer
    • View Profile
Re: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F
« Reply #182 on: January 15, 2012, 08:52:24 pm »
u should make a special F route with the Culver Viaduct construction it will be cool

there will be some G.Os like that in the weekend version

Offline Fan Railer

  • Global Moderator
  • Dispatcher
  • ****
  • Posts: 897
  • Gender: Male
  • Train Developer
    • View Profile
    • Fan Railer's YouTube Channel
Re: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F
« Reply #183 on: January 16, 2012, 06:12:54 pm »
Will 3rd rail gaps be put in on this route?

on the SMEE version - yes ,even though alot of smee's have batteries to prevent power loss .


NTT version - no , the NTTS have a battery that prevents the loss of power .

Just fyi, but NTT's still lose traction and HVAC power when going over third rail gaps.

Offline Dj Hammers

  • Head Admin
  • Supervisor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,034
  • Gender: Male
  • 7 Years of Developing for openBVE!
    • View Profile
    • My YouTube Channel
Re: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F
« Reply #184 on: January 16, 2012, 06:24:57 pm »
Mr Railfan could use some member contributions: http://www.bvestation.com/contributor/index.php

Offline nightmare403

  • Conductor
  • **
  • Posts: 164
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F
« Reply #185 on: January 16, 2012, 06:33:26 pm »
u should make a special F route with the Culver Viaduct construction it will be cool

there will be some G.Os like that in the weekend version

ok  ;D


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Offline Mr Railfan

  • Head Admin
  • Dispatcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 620
  • Gender: Male
  • Train Developer and Route Developer
    • View Profile
Re: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F
« Reply #186 on: February 04, 2012, 12:28:50 am »
A quick Update :

Just finished updating the Culver Express , 6ave Local -63st connector , and queens blvd express with timers and updated signals. They have also been updated with Brightness command .

Next thing im working on is :
Updating the culver local and queens blvd local [Roosevelt avenue - 179st ]with timers , updated signals and Brightness Command .

This will then be followed by updating the F reroute Via 53st connector and the remainder of the queens blvd local [Queens Plaza - Roosevelt avenue]


If all goes well i might even include a crosstown reroute scenario  8) , but thats pushing it so please dont get your hopes up.  :P

Offline SubwayTrainOperator5

  • Dispatcher
  • ****
  • Posts: 761
  • Gender: Male
  • R44, R46, and R68 fan / OpenBVE Videomaker
    • View Profile
    • My YouTube Channel
Re: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F
« Reply #187 on: February 04, 2012, 01:21:20 am »
Sounds great. A question, can you also make a Brooklyn bound (F) too? Because that would be great.
Signature Removed (dead link)

Offline Fox-179

  • Dispatcher
  • ****
  • Posts: 907
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F
« Reply #188 on: February 04, 2012, 10:04:11 am »
Great updates the Culver should take no more than maybe 10 minutes to add timers to since there are not even 5.
Maybe one or two after W8th clear all the way to Smith-9th then a few going downhill and some btwn Bergen and Jay.

Offline Simon

  • Conductor
  • **
  • Posts: 223
  • Gender: Male
  • BVEStation Member / Community Critic
    • View Profile
Re: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F
« Reply #189 on: February 04, 2012, 12:07:54 pm »
Will the next version also include the replacement of the older objects with tjay's newer ones? Or will that come in a later release?
Kawasaki_Plant

Offline Mr Railfan

  • Head Admin
  • Dispatcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 620
  • Gender: Male
  • Train Developer and Route Developer
    • View Profile
Re: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F
« Reply #190 on: February 04, 2012, 12:36:37 pm »
Sounds great. A question, can you also make a Brooklyn bound (F) too? Because that would be great.

yes currently Imanuel is trying to create a brooklyn bound version , at least up to church avenue .

 
Great updates the Culver should take no more than maybe 10 minutes to add timers to since there are not even 5.
Maybe one or two after W8th clear all the way to Smith-9th then a few going downhill and some btwn Bergen and Jay.

yes the timers shouldn't be a problem , but replacing all the regular signals , homeballs , placing in repeater signals where necessary and adding in the brightness command all take some time .

 
Will the next version also include the replacement of the older objects with tjay's newer ones? Or will that come in a later release?

yes there will be some objects that will be replaced with tjays objects and multiple objects i create . im not sure about tunnel walls yet .

Offline rstar

  • Operator
  • ***
  • Posts: 257
  • Gender: Male
  • MailMan
    • View Profile
Re: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F
« Reply #191 on: February 04, 2012, 01:55:51 pm »
Question Will there be a F via the C line?

Offline Fox-179

  • Dispatcher
  • ****
  • Posts: 907
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Official Thread for nycta Queensbound F
« Reply #192 on: February 04, 2012, 03:54:55 pm »
Question Will there be a F via the C line?
The Original routes needs to be done 1st at least before G.O's come in the picture since there is no Manhattan bound (A) or (C) if there was it would be totally possibly if you mean S/B the (E)(F) needs to obviously be completed from the terminals upto about Queens Plaza and if someone can make the connection for via Court Sq and connect the route to the (G) it would be a blast (F) via Queens Blvd Exp or LCL via Crosstown to Smith-9th.