Messages

76

Transit / Re: Question about R46 F train 2011

« on: July 18, 2011, 10:09:37 pm »

so basically with the R68A's on the N and Q increasing the spare R160's will go on the B am I a getting this right

77

Transit / Re: Question about R46 F train 2011

« on: July 17, 2011, 02:58:26 pm »

I had an interview that I needed to take the G train to go to so I already knew about the R68 G

78

Transit / Re: Question about R46 F train 2011

« on: July 17, 2011, 01:50:38 pm »

alright thanks good to know

79

Transit / Re: Question about R46 F train 2011

« on: July 17, 2011, 11:46:23 am »

Alright thanks is there anything else I need to know because I am about 5 months late on
The info and I want to catch up

80

Transit / Re: Question about R46 F train 2011

« on: July 17, 2011, 01:46:18 am »

alright thanks so is that the same thing with seeing the R32A train and R46 C train recently on youtube as well

81

Transit / Question about R46 F train 2011

« on: July 17, 2011, 01:30:33 am »

I have been really busy with private stuff and publicity stuff asd I have not been keeping up on the MTA stuff
and i am trying to catch myself up as fast as I can and today I saw an R46 F train at 42nd street and
I was thinking WTF so what I want to know is how long has this been happeneing

82

Other Projects / Re: Official Thread for the Bronx Zoo bound (12)

« on: July 15, 2011, 07:48:54 pm »

is this route going to have an express diamond service or will it just be fully local

83

Other Projects / Re: Moving to Trainz Forever!

« on: July 13, 2011, 07:48:33 pm »

Everyone has personal lives but you do not need to announce it anyway goodbye

84

General BVE/OpenBVE / Re: What route/train are you playing or have just finished.

« on: July 02, 2011, 05:34:38 pm »

just finished the L train with an R179

85

BVEStation Network News / Re: Independence Day Weekend Releases

« on: July 02, 2011, 10:55:14 am »

Where are we suppose to put the sound files

86

NYCTA Projects / Re: Official Update Thread For The Bronx-Bound 4 Line

« on: June 24, 2011, 11:37:45 pm »

well I think he meant like a skeleton but I agree it would be a waste because if the developer made it that far and deep into the route it is late to make a skeleton and I believe skeleton routes have so what I say is wait time willl fly by fast and we would be able to drive it soon

87

Transit / Re: How'd R160's Look on the (B)

« on: June 22, 2011, 02:15:43 pm »

well I heard this motto growin up and matches what you just said people will always complain about something

88

Transit / Re: How'd R160's Look on the (B)

« on: June 21, 2011, 08:18:17 pm »

well I am not sure if you were involved with or not with the topic about the R160 where we classified the R160 as a toy train and the R32,42,68 basically the trains before the R160 as real trains which it kind of is true because the R160 it just says everything to you that it does not feel like what tranportation use to be back before the r160's were ever put into play

89

Transit / Re: How'd R160's Look on the (B)

« on: June 21, 2011, 08:08:39 pm »

well there are many perespectives when it comes to this but I think that what they should do is put more "real" trains and forget about the R160 because it looses the meaning of a route I still remember yesterday I was taking the 4 train (R142A) a torist came up to me was like is that the 2 train she thought it because of the red circle in the front they really need to fix that or at least make the circles a bit bigger because when a train enters a train station it can be reletively difficult to read until the side display is facing you

90

BVEStation Network News / Re: Riverbank Park Shuttle Updated

« on: June 17, 2011, 02:57:45 pm »

It would probably be called the R178 lol in order for that fleet to be in service for that route