BVEStation Forums

Community => Transit => Topic started by: [CT1660] on January 20, 2012, 10:01:53 am

Title: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: [CT1660] on January 20, 2012, 10:01:53 am
So here we have, a fresh 5-car set of R188's that arrived yesterday to Corona Yard. Here it is currently as of today. It is sporting the diamond <7> on the front LED.

(http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/1215/dsc05585j.jpg)

(http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/6456/dsc05586k.jpg)

(http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/140/dsc05587y.jpg)
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: ErrorMacro11 on January 20, 2012, 11:25:25 am
amazing
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: Lance on January 20, 2012, 06:04:48 pm
Nice catch. The other five will be there soon. And to those wondering, no, they will not be in service any time soon.
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: [CT1660] on January 20, 2012, 06:38:43 pm
Nice catch. The other five will be there soon. And to those wondering, no, they will not be in service any time soon.

You mean six. Remember, the (7) runs 11-car trains.
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: rstar on January 21, 2012, 08:20:55 am
It look like a R142.
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: rstar on January 21, 2012, 08:22:14 am
Now how much u want to bet that the R179 going to look like the R160.
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: error46146 on January 21, 2012, 10:28:27 am
Technically it is an R142A..it's a refurbished R142A with CBTC equipment installed behind the cab. Its very likely the R179s will look just like R160s seeing the MTA continues its trend of 'fleet uniformity'.

btw you cannot become a motorman right after high school, you need a certain amount of work experience before you can become qualified to be a motorman. you can be a conductor and work your way up however
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: Fox-179 on January 21, 2012, 11:01:34 am
Thats what I was wondering looks like an R-142A from the exterior the only difference stated above is the cab installations the interior can have a FIND though but no noticeable differences in that R-142A still has the fleet numbers nothing has changed  :o
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: [CT1660] on January 21, 2012, 11:58:15 am
Thats what I was wondering looks like an R-142A from the exterior the only difference stated above is the cab installations the interior can have a FIND though but no noticeable differences in that R-142A still has the fleet numbers nothing has changed  :o

There is no point for the conversion sets (and new R188 cars) to have FiNDS as they will just solely run on the (7) <7>. In fact, a TA worker told me it is more likely it will have a strip map than a FiND.
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: Fox-179 on January 21, 2012, 02:08:40 pm
There is no point for the conversion sets (and new R188 cars) to have FiNDS as they will just solely run on the (7) <7>. In fact, a TA worker told me it is more likely it will have a strip map than a FiND.
Exactly just a waste and spending more money the #7 has been ranked very well with those 62A's.Better off with the stripmap anyways!
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: Slants4Lyfe on January 21, 2012, 02:12:16 pm
There was no idea to put FIND displays on the R188 anyways. it was just a wide spreaded rumor.
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: error46146 on January 21, 2012, 03:11:38 pm
AFAIK the R188 has no FIND, only strip maps.
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: [CT1660] on January 21, 2012, 05:16:10 pm
Besides, the only way the (7) is connected to the rest of the system is via the BMT Astoria/Broadway line. As you know, the entire Flushing Line solely hosts the (7), just like the BMT Canarsie Line solely hosts the (L), which explains why both were picked to use CBTC in the first place, as they are both self-contained routes.
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: Mr Railfan on January 21, 2012, 06:22:54 pm
Besides, the only way the (7) is connected to the rest of the system is via the BMT Astoria/Broadway line. As you know, the entire Flushing Line solely hosts the (7), just like the BMT Canarsie Line solely hosts the (L), which explains why both were picked to use CBTC in the first place, as they are both self-contained routes.


If i remember correctly CBTC wasnt just picked for the L because its a self containing route , but due to the sheer Volume of complaints on the Line . Pre CBTC ,  the line was much slower[Less TPH] and more packed then it it today . Same thing with the 7 . By bringing CBTC to the 7 , there will be more TPH and less crowding due to faster train service and more trains .
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: [CT1660] on January 21, 2012, 06:37:42 pm
Besides, the only way the (7) is connected to the rest of the system is via the BMT Astoria/Broadway line. As you know, the entire Flushing Line solely hosts the (7), just like the BMT Canarsie Line solely hosts the (L), which explains why both were picked to use CBTC in the first place, as they are both self-contained routes.


If i remember correctly CBTC wasnt just picked for the L because its a self containing route , but due to the sheer Volume of complaints on the Line . Pre CBTC ,  the line was much slower[Less TPH] and more packed then it it today . Same thing with the 7 . By bringing CBTC to the 7 , there will be more TPH and less crowding due to faster train service and more trains .

That too as well.
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: joyjeong15 on youtube on January 22, 2012, 06:43:16 pm
Not r188 is r142
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: joyjeong15 on youtube on January 22, 2012, 06:59:00 pm
Not r188 is r142
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: Lance on January 22, 2012, 07:17:21 pm
It's a converted R142A set, which has been reclassified as an R188.
Title: Re: R188 @ Corona Yard
Post by: joyjeong15 on youtube on January 22, 2012, 07:19:52 pm
When is test and test