BVEStation Forums
BVE => General BVE/OpenBVE => Topic started by: toniotonio55 on June 16, 2011, 03:55:22 pm
-
Does any one have an automated A or c train route or has a F train running via the C line route?
-
The F train running via the C route, nope. Currently we do not have any G.O. routes available, the closest thing to that would probably be the battery run for the G to Smith-9th.
I dont think anyone has automated announcements for the A or C, I guess you can wait to see if any other members have any ideas.
-
Does any one have an automated A or c train route or has a F train running via the C line route?
R160 (F) Train To Euclid Ave via (C) Line Announcements (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRxLepor4gQ#)
-
here is the link for B via C
http://www.4shared.com/file/FzlikSE5/B_via_C.html (http://www.4shared.com/file/FzlikSE5/B_via_C.html)
-
here is the link for B via C
http://www.4shared.com/file/FzlikSE5/B_via_C.html (http://www.4shared.com/file/FzlikSE5/B_via_C.html)
Can you please stop distributing my stuff without permission please?
-
here is the link for B via C
http://www.4shared.com/file/FzlikSE5/B_via_C.html (http://www.4shared.com/file/FzlikSE5/B_via_C.html)
Can you please stop distributing my stuff without permission please?
He's not distributing stuff he just provided a link.So if I provide a link to a free trial game or anti-virus I would be considered distributing stuff?
And I know what you guys did but I'm not gonna say anything until someone else does you're lucky you're still here.
-
Did you consider that maybe Train man didn't want his project public just yet? That maybe he just put it online to link to his beta testers?
Just a thought...
-
is it me or is the coding the same exact one as the (C)?
-
is it me or is the coding the same exact one as the (C)?
The only real change is that it starts in the Bronx. Also, the rails on the tracks arent parallel, there are platforms on the Concourse Express tracks, and there are missing objects basically everywhere.
-
Did you consider that maybe Train man didn't want his project public just yet? That maybe he just put it online to link to his beta testers?
Just a thought...
It's available to EVERYONE in his thread My B via C line.
1.He's claiming its his route when obviously its a combined B and C.
2.Modified without permission? And RELEASED!
is it me or is the coding the same exact one as the (C)?
Yea you're not the only one.
The only real change is that it starts in the Bronx. Also, the rails on the tracks arent parallel, there are platforms on the Concourse Express tracks, and there are missing objects basically everywhere.
Idk if its me but its perfect from Bedford to 125th thats when its a tunnel wall missing around the curve the rest of the route is missing walls but it isn't a big deal I load up errorless.
-
triple posting removed
-
triple posting removed
-
Did you consider that maybe Train man didn't want his project public just yet? That maybe he just put it online to link to his beta testers?
Just a thought...
It's available to EVERYONE in his thread My B via C line.
1.He's claiming its his route when obviously its a combined B and C.
2.Modified without permission? And RELEASED!
That's the thing - Train man didn't publicly release the line, jr1234 did. While Train man didn't say anything to stop this, I still stand by my earlier statement that this was a beta release which was previously private. On the subject of permission, I hope Train man got the okay from everyone responsible for the (B) and (C) lines.
On a side note, I have run this route through Route Viewer and the list of errors was quite long. Now this is just an unproven theory, but if one wanted to create a new route using two or more lines, couldn't they just take the first route and combine it with the second at a common area. Using the (C) via Concourse as an example, I'd take the (B) from Bedford Park Blvd to 135 St (not 145 St for obvious reasons) and combine that with the (C) from 135 St to Euclid Av and change the distances so they match up perfectly. However, this is just an idea.
-
Heres the thing that pisses developers off. I was asked permission to make this line by using the B & C I created. I gave permission for it to be made, but with the stipulation that I get to see it before it got released. I never received a copy. Now before all you guys start crying about it, let me explain why this pisses me off.
1. I like to check the quality of the route.
2. Most importantly I need to see the README for the route. If someone decides to put something inappropriate in the route, and doesnt change the README and gets released MY NAME is on it. Ive said it before, I don`t deserve to have some LE knocking on my door for BS.
Why can`t most of you guys understand this?
Joe