BVEStation

Author Topic: (RELEASED) Official Development thread for the R46 for OpenBVE  (Read 247124 times)

Offline SubwayTrainOperator5

  • Dispatcher
  • ****
  • Posts: 761
  • Gender: Male
  • R44, R46, and R68 fan / OpenBVE Videomaker
    • View Profile
    • My YouTube Channel
Re: (RELEASED) Official Development thread for the R46 for OpenBVE
« Reply #300 on: April 17, 2012, 10:01:37 pm »
As I said in the comment I posted on it, the controller could use work too. But it does look amazing!
Signature Removed (dead link)

Offline rstar

  • Operator
  • ***
  • Posts: 257
  • Gender: Male
  • MailMan
    • View Profile
Re: (RELEASED) Official Development thread for the R46 for OpenBVE
« Reply #301 on: April 20, 2012, 06:15:17 pm »
OMG i feel like im in the MTA already. Also I love cab. ;D

Offline rstar

  • Operator
  • ***
  • Posts: 257
  • Gender: Male
  • MailMan
    • View Profile
Re: (RELEASED) Official Development thread for the R46 for OpenBVE
« Reply #302 on: May 31, 2012, 06:17:33 am »
Will there be a BVE 4 version with the new cab? 

Offline Mr Railfan

  • Head Admin
  • Dispatcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 621
  • Gender: Male
  • Train Developer and Route Developer
    • View Profile
Re: (RELEASED) Official Development thread for the R46 for OpenBVE
« Reply #303 on: May 31, 2012, 09:01:53 am »
Will there be a BVE 4 version with the new cab?
I dont see how , the brightness commands and panel2.cfg is not supported by bve4.

Offline SubwayTrainOperator5

  • Dispatcher
  • ****
  • Posts: 761
  • Gender: Male
  • R44, R46, and R68 fan / OpenBVE Videomaker
    • View Profile
    • My YouTube Channel
Re: (RELEASED) Official Development thread for the R46 for OpenBVE
« Reply #304 on: May 31, 2012, 02:23:31 pm »
Will there be a BVE 4 version with the new cab?
I dont see how , the brightness commands and panel2.cfg is not supported by bve4.

Actually, brightness commands ARE supported by BVE4, and so is the Oskari plugin, but I do not think the Panel2.cfg is though.
Signature Removed (dead link)

Offline Dj Hammers

  • Head Admin
  • Supervisor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,034
  • Gender: Male
  • 7 Years of Developing for openBVE!
    • View Profile
    • My YouTube Channel
Re: (RELEASED) Official Development thread for the R46 for OpenBVE
« Reply #305 on: May 31, 2012, 03:23:23 pm »
Actually Panel2.cfg is supported by BVE4. However, the R46 uses so many little OpenBVE-only features in its panel that porting it to BVE4 would entail pretty much redo'ing the entire panel.

Offline LexingtonAvExp

  • New Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Gender: Male
  • BVEStation Member
    • View Profile
Re: (RELEASED) Official Development thread for the R46 for OpenBVE
« Reply #306 on: May 31, 2012, 03:54:43 pm »
Is there any release date in site?

Offline error46146

  • Head Admin
  • Dispatcher
  • ******
  • Posts: 620
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Photography by me.
Re: (RELEASED) Official Development thread for the R46 for OpenBVE
« Reply #307 on: May 31, 2012, 04:27:28 pm »
No I am not developing for BVE4, and No there is no exact release date yet.

Offline [CT1660]

  • Dispatcher
  • ****
  • Posts: 575
  • Gender: Male
  • openBVE Developer, OMSI Repainter & Engine Modder
    • View Profile
    • Enter The Lair

Offline SubwayTrainOperator5

  • Dispatcher
  • ****
  • Posts: 761
  • Gender: Male
  • R44, R46, and R68 fan / OpenBVE Videomaker
    • View Profile
    • My YouTube Channel
Re: (RELEASED) Official Development thread for the R46 for OpenBVE
« Reply #309 on: June 07, 2012, 10:18:46 pm »
Looks good, but in real life the R46's do not have the (J), (M), (Z), or (L) rollsigns because they are 75 feet long and they are not allowed on those lines
Signature Removed (dead link)

Offline [CT1660]

  • Dispatcher
  • ****
  • Posts: 575
  • Gender: Male
  • openBVE Developer, OMSI Repainter & Engine Modder
    • View Profile
    • Enter The Lair
Re: (RELEASED) Official Development thread for the R46 for OpenBVE
« Reply #310 on: June 07, 2012, 10:41:11 pm »
Looks good, but in real life the R46's do not have the (J), (M), (Z), or (L) rollsigns because they are 75 feet long and they are not allowed on those lines

Actually you're wrong on this one. The R44 and R46 both have full rollsign sets, which includes the J, L, M and Z readings. They also have a program for the mentioned lines. Although they won't use them for the BMT Eastern division, they have the program there.

Offline nyctrman

  • Conductor
  • **
  • Posts: 247
  • Gender: Male
  • BVEStation Member
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: June 07, 2012, 11:09:59 pm by nyctrman »

Offline Lance

  • Operator
  • ***
  • Posts: 283
  • Gender: Male
  • BVEStation Member
    • View Profile
Re: (RELEASED) Official Development thread for the R46 for OpenBVE
« Reply #312 on: June 08, 2012, 08:25:39 am »
Adding on to this, the R46s have the Eastern Division bullets on the front rollsigns because all of the R4X cars uses (or has used) the same rollsigns. Sometime in the past, probably when the bullets were changed in the 70s/80s, the TA ordered the same rollsigns, regardless of whether the train could run on a particular line.

'70s style service sign at Times Sq-42 St.

Offline Failsafe

  • Operator
  • ***
  • Posts: 315
  • Gender: Male
  • Community Advisor
    • View Profile
Re: (RELEASED) Official Development thread for the R46 for OpenBVE
« Reply #313 on: June 08, 2012, 09:44:04 am »
Even though i have not been on the forum for months now, i must say Rikabs, you are doing a superb job.

I just want to give thanks to all the people who develop routes and trains for Openbve/Bve2/Bve4 because they really dont have to, they could be hanging out with there friends, but instead there working for the general public at no cost.

I think this is something alot of people on this forum (not all people) Forget when people develop trains and routes

Anyways, keep up the good work mate  ;)
Bvestation Police Department-To protect and serve

Offline nightmare403

  • Conductor
  • **
  • Posts: 164
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile


Uploaded with ImageShack.us